Different systems that make up various organizations, exist through their relationships with each other. Every component of an organization has the potential to affect all the other components. Some relationships are easily understood; others seem incomprehensible.
Process: All components of a system interact with each other to form patterns, and the system itself is defined by these patterns. In my work, these patterns and their relationship to the systems are explored, to create continually evolving systems that provide even more possibilities.
Change: As a response to the changing environment or architectural space, a system changes in a way that remains consistent within itself in that environment. With an evidence of history in the development of each system and an open-ended historical process, the systems have the potential for continued growth.
Stability: To maintain the stability of such continually developing systems, the various patterns that make up these systems have to be studied individually/separately. This kind of a decentralized process, is linear and non-linear at the same time, a paradox.
Paradox: Paradox thus – contrary to its implications as a closed system – becomes the point of origin for an inexhaustible number of interpretations that create continually evolving systems. It constantly questions the identity of its parts, their dualities and limits, while aiding the development of evolving systems. The process of drawing becomes a paradox by identifying the limits of a concept and establishing identities, but at the same time assisting in the transcendence of these limits to create the infinite possibilities. The way drawing acts as an intermediary between other art forms and the concept of drawing not just as preliminary preparation but as something that has inexhaustible number of interpretations, qualifies drawing as a tool to explore concepts that exist despite lack of definite boundaries.
← Back
